Thursday, July 3, 2008

Summer stint at M&M



Craving for the summers to start

Restlessly i waited so long

In line was a stint at Mahindra

The will to perform so strong


Nothing was sure or structured

Every challenge though a treat

The freedom to have a free hand

Freely flowed thoughts upbeat


Our whole lives we long for moments

When people will herald our thought

The fight is always to put across

The essence of the idea never sought


But Ideas & suggestions were valued

Passionately pursued in earnest

Always on my toes did i feel

Getting ready to tackle the next test


Good things, they say, come to an end

Can they really? Do i ask

Memories so sweet, learning’s to cherish

Craving again for a new task

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Which side of your brain is dominant?

Which side of your brain is dominant?
Left or Right?
Find out here with this simple test !!!


Image and video hosting by TinyPic


If u see it moving
Clockwise – u r right brained
Anti-clockwise – u r left brained

Since we use both sides of the brain, if we concentrate & use the other side of the brain, we will be able to see the figure moving in the opposite direction

I am right brained :) When i tried to think of the solution to some logic puzzle, the figure started moving anti-clockwise....but after that again clock-wise. It is said that more number of people see the figure anti-clockwise.

Left Brain Functions

Right Brain Functions



Uses Logic

Uses feeling

Detail Oriented

"big picture" oriented

Facts Rule

imagination rules

Words & Language

symbols and images

Present & Past

present and future

Math & science

philosophy & religion

Can comprehend

can "get it" (i.e. meaning)

Knowing

believes

acknowledges

appreciates

Order/pattern perception

spatial perception

Knows object name

knows object function

Reality based

fantasy based

Forms strategies

presents possibilities

practical

impetuous

safe

risk taking

Friday, April 25, 2008

Prisoner's dilemma , iterations and analogies



The basic Prisoner's dilemma model:

Two prisoner's are lodged in different cells.They can't communicate with each other. They were partners in some crime. The police interrogates. The situation is like this....

IF both say they aren't guilty, both will get 3 years imprisonment due to non-cooperation.

If one says he is not guilty, but if the other accepts that he is guilty then the second person will get a lighter sentence due to cooperation with the police and the first person who pleaded not guilty would get a longer sentence.

So the thinking process of any prisoner will be that if i say i am not guilty but the other prisoner doesn't support then i will get a heavier sentence. And the other person will definitely not say guilty for fear of the first pleading guilty."Trust" is not trustworthy. So ultimately it boils down to the fact that both will say that they are guilty and both will get a longer term than had they both pleaded that they aren't guilty.


This might be child's play for everyone to understand.....but this can be made more exciting.

Say for instance that there are several iterations where in both the people are allowed to remember each other's responses. Then how will the game proceed. Say for instance, in the above example both Dave and Henry have pleaded guilty according to our explained thought process. It was too early for them to trust each other in the first round itself.


In the second or some later round, say Dave starts thinking. He thinks that we both know that pleading not guilty together is best for us. Is there any chance of cooperation from the other prisoner? I am a logical person and so is he. Both want our terms to be reduced. So if i plead not guilty, will he say not guilty too. Lemme take the chance since it seems we are starting to understand each other.

But all human beings are different. Trusting someone might be easier for someone and not so easy for others. So say DAVE says not guilty. Henry has still not gained so much trust of Dave. He pleads guilty. Dave is the loser in this case

In the next round, both again start thinking. Dave is smarting from the non-cooperation. Henry feels a bit guilty for letting down his partner in crime. He wishes that he had shown more faith. Henry pleads not guilty. Dave has two options. He might plead not guilty and both achieve the best outcome. This is very much possible since people think in many ways. For our case let's say he doesn't trust Henry so much now. He is unsure. He says guilty. So now Henry is the loser.


In the next round Henry thinks that Ok .. Dave didnt support me. Maybe it is my own fault. I had let him down. So he was not sure whether to trust me. Also he knows that now i have had a change of heart. So there is a possibility that he too pleads not guilty. So Henry says "not guilty". Dave thinks so too...that there is a change of heart of Henry and there is a possibility of a best outcome. So he will say "not guilty"

And the best outcome is achieved.

We can see that at some point in time, trust starts building. And in the long run, both achieve the best outcome due to cooperation with each other.


This is what happens in real life too. Consider our formative years. Children are referred to as gifts of GOD. Maybe it is true....but definitely not in the sense of virtues. Truth is that they are the most selfish of all human beings. Just look into ur childhood. Most of us will have so many images which we know shouldn't have been so. In a multiple environment, we see and observe...and learn to trust more people than our near ones. We start cooperating. And we start growing literally and figuratively. In the long run, the selfishness may remain in some part of our heart...but the awareness of need for behaving in a particular way in situations to benefit the society is cemented in our minds. Some sort of balance is reached. And the society functions in harmony.

This is not to say that selfishness is bad. Selfishness has its own virtues. Take a family for example. The mother is said to be the bonding locus of control. She is the one who binds the whole family together and makes it a proper home. She has a natural nurturing nature. She thinks these are my children. And this feeling is so strong that she wants to protect them from all possible harm. Think a bit earlier. She is part of a new family. Her husband is the most important for her in that family. She has left her home of years to come and stay with this person. Everything is strange and new. Her husband is the main comforting factor. Secondly, her old house is no longer her house. This is her house for ever now.

These feelings ..... my husband....my house....my children....all these "my's" contribute to the selfishness. Care is a natural corollary. This selfishness creates the happy home we are talking about. Here selfishness is not bad because we are not trying to gain anything by snatching from others. Life is not a zero sum game.

Adam Smith had said that the best result will come when everyone in the group thinks what is best for himself and acts so. He says that individual efforts contributes to the growth of the whole. Might be so in the short term. But in the long run, best result will come only when all individuals think what is best for themselves and for the group.



Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Short Story


This is the tale of a 5 year old girl and her dad. One day the girl was waiting at the door for her dad to return from work. He returned very tired and saw the girl at the door. As soon as she saw him, she asked him how much he earned per hour. He was irritated by this. And quite angry. Yet somehow he regained his composure and replied that he earned Rs. 300 per hour.

She asked him whether he could give her 250 rupees.
This really irritated him. He had not even set foot in the house and his daughter was pestering him. He shouted at her and told her to go back to her room. After some time, when he had calmed down, he went to see his daughter. She was awake.He gave her the 250 rupees she had asked for earlier.

Then, reaching under her pillow she pulled some crumpled notes. Dad, seeing that the girl already had money, started to get angry again.


The little girl slowly counted her money, then looked up at her father. "Why do you want money if you already had some?" the father grumbled.


"Because I didn't have enough, but now I do," the little girl replied.


"Daddy I have Rs. 300 now. Can I buy an hour of your time? Please come home early tomorrow. I would like to have dinner with you"

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Aamchi mumbai in early 1900's


Train coming out of Parsik tunnel in early 1900’s. It is the first rail tunnel of India. Near thane.One entry exit point is at mumbra.I travel thru this everyday !! It is 1.3 km in length and is in the sahyadri range. The hills are known as Parsik hills
__________


Gowalia tank- grant road, Mahatma Gandhi gave the call for Civil disobedience movement here in 1942. Also famous for “Simon Go Back” i.e the August Kranthi
__________



Marine Drive 1930
_________


Bullock Carts in Mumbai !!
__________


Ballard pier in South Mumbai had a railway station !!!
___________



Frontier Mail chugging out of Ballard Pier Railway Station
_________



Churchgate Railway Station, 1930
__________


Churchgate railway station 1910
__________

Thursday, January 31, 2008

A Tribute to Bobby Fischer - the Chess Legend




The chess maverick and legend Bobby Fischer died this month (on 18th jan 2008) in Iceland at the age of 64.

The US-born player, who became famous for beating Cold War Soviet rival Boris Spassky in 1972, died of an unspecified illness.




He became a US chess champion at 14 and then the youngest grandmaster a year later. He achieved world fame after playing a world championship match in Iceland in 1972, beating title-holder Spassky.




The so-called chess "match of the century" came to be seen as a proxy for the Cold War, as the Soviets had held the world title since World War II.

Mr Fischer, the individual who had triumphed over the might of the Communist system, became an American hero.



The 1972 match made chess fashionable beyond imagination. Every person ,be it a chess player or a layman, seemed to know who Fischer was and how the match went about...especially Fischer's eccentricities.


He lost the world chess crown in 1975 after refusing to play against his Soviet rival Anatoly Karpov and retired from chess when he was at his peak possibly bcoz he didnt find any player worthy enuf to challenge him.


He was an extremely reclusive personality and lived undetected in Japan for a number of years. US tried to extradite him to US to punish him for illegally playing Boris Spassky in a return match in 1992 in Yogoslavia an alien country for US at that time.



BORIS SPASSKY HIMSELF WROTE A LETTER TO THE US PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH IN 2004 REQUESTNG TO PARDON BOBBY FISCHER.


What can be a more fitting tribute than ur sworn opponent praising and fighting for u? REPRODUCING THE LETTER HERE.

"Appeal to President Bush from Boris Spassky


Mr. President,


In 1972 Bobby Fischer became national hero. He smashed me in the match in Reykjavik. The Soviet chess hegemony collapsed. One man won against a whole army. Soon after that Fischer stopped playing. He repeated the sad story of Paul Morphy. At the age of 21, legendary Paul had beaten all leading European masters and became unofficial champion. He stopped playing and finished his tragic life at the age of 47 in New Orleans in 1884.
In 1992, twenty years after Reykjavik, there was a miracle. Bobby resuscitated and we played a match in Yugoslavia. But at that time there were sanctions against Yugoslavia forbidding American citizens any sort of activity on the territory of Yugoslavia. Bobby violated the instructions of the State Department. He became the subject of a warrant for arrest issued on December 15, 1992 by the US District Court. As for me, as a French citizen since 1978, I did not get any sanctions from the French government.

Spassky vs Fischer during the match of the century in Reykjavik in 1972
Since July 13, 2004, Bobby has been detained at Narita airport on immigration violations. Further events have been described by media.
It is clear that the law is the law. But Fischer’s case is not usual. I am an old friend of Bobby since 1960 when we played in Mar-del-Plata and shared 1-2 places. Bobby is a tragic personality. I realized this at that time. He is an honest and good natured man. Absolutely not social. He is not adaptable to everybody’s standards of life. He has a very high sense of justice and is unwilling to compromise as well as with his own conscience as with surrounding people. He is a person who is doing almost everything against himself.

I would not like to defend or justify Bobby Fischer. He is what he is. I am asking only for one thing. For mercy, charity.

If for some reason it is impossible, I would like to ask you the following: Please correct the mistake of President François Mitterand in 1992. Bobby and myself committed the same crime. Put sanctions against me also. Arrest me. And put me in the same cell with Bobby Fischer. And give us a chess set.


Boris Spassky10-th Chess World Champion08.07.2004 "

He was granted Icelandic citizenship in 2005 as a way to avoid being deported to the US.This was the same country where the historic Fischer- Spassky match 1972 had happened. Bcoz of this match Iceland became hugely popular and this was a great way to repay Bobby Fischer.
His cult book " My 60 Memorable Games" is a source of inspiration to each and every chess enthusiast . Like his book , Bobby Fischer will be etched in my memory for ever.









Tuesday, December 25, 2007

Christmas 1987 - My dream came true !!



It was in 1987. I was 7 years old. Christmas was there. All I knew about holidays was that there would be lots of people around! New clothes!! Gifts n goodies, sweets and dry fruits! Cricket! Some party! I was looking forward to all the fun.

I woke up in the morning and yet lay in bed. I had had a dream. A dream of dad bringing a Christmas cake in the evening. Now, cakes were a rare concept in my house. Even on birthday’s we never brought any cakes. And so a full blown cake…a huge chocolaty one…fluffy to the max….being brought home couldn’t be easily brushed off. Moreover, a type of cake, which I had never laid eyes on before. If u have seen the original Christmas cakes u would realize how adorable they are. No cream, no fancy stuff. Just a huge fluffy cake with lots of nuts. Even searching for those nuts is like a treasure hunt!!

So, I pulled myself out of bed, went to the drawing room. Grandpa was telling all plans for the Christmas to mom. Dad had gone to handle some business related work. I told them that dad would be bringing a chocolate Christmas cake in the evening. I had seen it in my dream and I described the cake.

Evening came and so did dad. He was carrying a huge box. Grandpa said what I had told. We took the cake out of the box and lo!! Behold!! There it was. My dream had come true.